Regional Integration And Its Possibilities

Regional Integration And Its Possibilities

By Edward Fagan

Regional integration, the good side

Regional integration can succeed among countries that are fiercely nationalistic. This is only likely to happen, however, if political union is optional for each country.

Those countries, therefore, who prefer to relinquish their sovereignty can have full integration. Those, who thus prefer not to do so, can remain sovereign independent states.

Countries participating in the integration process who remain sovereign can still benefit from, and contribute to the community. They and the community can pursue: Bilateral trade, joint development and investment ventures, and cooperation in several areas.

These areas of cooperation can include: crime and drug trafficking detection and prevention, and education and training. They can also cooperate their efforts in: disease prevention and control, and responses to shared environmental concerns. Finally, they can also work together in mutually using the sea as an economic resource.

The topics I mention in this piece are relevant to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). This well-intentioned agreement involves the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

Regional integration, the problems

Sovereignty is precious, we must never relinquish it.  We will suffer several disadvantages if we relinquish our sovereignty to become a part of a regional super state.

These disadvantages include our having to abolish immigration processing procedures for persons from other territories in the region. We will thus have to allow them unrestricted entry into our country at all times.

They will therefore enter without having to produce any documents at all. This same unchecked and undocumented entry will apply to aircraft and seacraft entering our country from the region.

Criminals, drug dealers, money launderers, drug addicts and drugs from the region will flood our country without any trace. Other undesirable persons such as prostitutes and people with certain diseases will also do the same. These people will put our health care, social services, housing and such sectors at risks. The demographics of our country will also change permanently, and we might one day, just end up losing our country.

I can recall examples in history of a people losing their identity and country. The latter-mentioned conditions above can contribute to this unfortunate situation becoming a harsh reality.

by Edward Fagan

Please also see the following post in this blog:

Nation And State, Terms We Should Understand

Like Edward Fagan Blog on Facebook:

Edward Fagan Blog On Facebook

 

 

Policing Practices And Their Effectiveness

Crime, Punishment And Reform; Policing Practices And Their Effectiveness

By Edward Fagan

Policing, a vital service

Policing is an important field. Every society requiring people to act within its laws must have a police force to ensure this happens. Society thus must highly train and properly equip its police force. This police force can then perform its duty efficiently and effectively within the law..

This police force must also employ qualified and impartial selectors. It must, additionally, use an effective selection process for screening applicants.

The police force should also select only the most suitable applicants available. They should recruit only applicants with the best possible character. Such applicants, trained by the ideal basic and continuing training programmes, will become good policemen.

Where the force practises illegal and habitual physical violence against citizens, authorities should launch an  independent and impartial enquiry. Such an enquiry should also exist where the force shows signs of corruption.

The law courts should prosecute members of the force who are guilty of illegal physical acts against citizens. The courts should also prosecute those members who perform acts of corruption.

Evidence of habitual physical abuse, or habitual corruption should also prompt a review of several areas of the force. This review should look at, among other areas and people, selection and recruitment processes, and recruiters. It should also look at training and appraisal, and their methods and content.

by Edward Fagan

Please also see the following post in this blog:

Arrest Of An Innocent Man Near A Junction

Like Edward Fagan Blog on Facebook:

Edward Fagan Blog On Facebook

Anti-science Supporters and Climate Change

The End of Life for A Man Who Has A Secret; Anti-science Supporters And Climate Change

By Edward Fagan

“For the cause that needs assistance, against the wrongs that need resistance”
Anti-science campaign

Anti-science congressmen and senators in the U.S. are increasing their campaign against climate science. They are also campaigning against government policy that aims to halt global warming. This anti-science movement, however, is not new and is traceable back to the early modern era.

Shortly after 1514 the Astronomer and Mathematician Nicolaus Copernicus published a book about the workings of our solar system. The Roman Catholic Church banned this book because it contradicted their teaching on the subject. They continued to ban it for decades after his death in 1543.

The Mathematician, Physicist and Astronomer Galileo Galilei confirmed and advocated the research findings of Copernicus. In 1633, at the end of inquisition proceedings, the Roman Catholic Church convicted him of heresy. The church placed him under house arrest until his death in 1642.

This current movement against climate science in the U.S. congress and senate is holding its inquisition against the scientists first. Hopefully, after they silence the scientists then they will destroy the regulators. Finally, they will end all regulation of the large corporations whose interests they are so fond of defending.

A the end of the day, large corporations would have destroyed our planet, our race, and they themselves. They would have carried out the perfect suicide mission, the perfect terrorist plot!

by Edward Fagan

Please also see the following post in this blog:

Honesty, An Important But Ignored Quality

Mental Health And Our Leaders

Like Edward Fagan Blog on Facebook:

Edward Fagan Blog On Facebook

 

Marriage, We Need To Clarify It

Marriage, We Need To Find It Again

An original essay

by Edward Fagan

Marriage ,what an institution

Marriage is a wonderful and very old institution. It is so old that some people have forgotten its origin. Some of us also never even defined it because we always knew what it was. Now, however, a movement is attempting to challenge it and the family.

During the 1980’s a movement started to demand a change to this institution that could have threatened it over time. That movement gained momentum and was about to succeed in its aim by the mid 1990’s. Then, in September of 1996 President Bill Clinton signed the Defence of Marriage Act (DOMA) into law. This bill staved off the attack until 2013 when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that section 3 of the act was unconstitutional.

Section 3 of the DOMA defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman. It defines “spouse” as a partner in a legally recognized heterosexual marriage.

By ruling this section of the DOMA unconstitutional, the Supreme Court made same sex marital unions legal in the U.S. This ruling set a questionable precedent for marriage elsewhere.

The marital union, by its nature and functioning, is and always will be a heterosexual relationship. It is for heterosexuals only. The family also is a heterosexual only institution. It involves biological reproduction, genetics and blood connections. Its members reproduce themselves perpetually through passing on their genes.

Homosexual and lesbian relationships therefore fail to replicate the family. There is thus no such thing as a homosexual or lesbian marital relationship or family.

by Edward Fagan

Please also see the following post in this blog:

Standing Up For Morality And The Family

Like Edward Fagan on Facebook:

Edward Fagan Blog On Facebook 

 

Capital-punishment, A Supporter’s View

Capital-punishment, A Supporter's View

An original essay

by Edward Fagan

Capital-punishment, its role

Capital-punishment always serves its intended purposes when a legally founded court enforces it against deserving persons. This form of punishment achieves several worthy objectives which no other form of punishment can ever achieve.

An executed murderer suffers justly, what his victim suffered unjustly. He can never commit murder again, but he could if sent to prison instead. Relatives and friends of the victim thus experience the maximum sense of justice.

Society, consequently, benefits from this as it has one less murderer to worry about. The economy benefits through not having to spend time, money and other resources on his upkeep in prison. The death penalty helps discourage others from committing murder. It would discourage more from this crime if they would perform it publicly.

Anti-death penalty supporters, however, disagree with this view. They are fighting for ending the death penalty on grounds that it does not prevent murder.

They are not fighting, equally, for the closure of prisons on those same grounds. Prisons allow murderers to return to society and become repeat murderers.

Imprisonment, therefore, does not prevent murder, it encourages it. It thus seems true that the anti death penalty supporters should also call for the closure of prisons. Failing to do this, they should allow the death penalty to continue, as they do prisons.

by Edward Fagan

Please also see the following post in this blog:

They Need Help Sometimes Following Incarceration

Like Edward Fagan Blog on Facebook:

Edward Fagan Blog On Facebook

 

 

Islam, A Few Little Known Facts

Home; Islam, A Few Little Known Facts

An original essay

by Edward Fagan

Islam, an overview

Islam makes news headlines ever so often, but there are a few things many do not know about this religion.

The word Allah is a derivative of the Arabic word Al-ilah. During pre-Islamic times, Al-ilah was the name of the moon god who married to the sun goddess. This pagan god fathered several daughters, including Al-Lat, Al-Uzza and Mannat. The Quran mentions these three daughters as goddesses in Sura 53: 19-20.

The Arabs worshipped Allah the moon god, and 359 other pagan gods, at a temple called the Kabah in Mecca. Here, each god had its own idol. The Arabs worshipped these 360 pagan gods by observing 4 customs which all Muslims still observe today. I state these 4 customs in the next paragraph.

Bowing toward Mecca, they prayed at specific times during the day. They made a pilgrimage to mecca. To the poor, they gave alms. They fasted during the day for a month, which began and ended with the appearance of the crescent moon. The crescent moon was the symbol for the moon god Allah.

The above information shows that Islam is old Arab pagan religion under another name.

Please also see the following post in this blog:

Refugee Crisis Causing Other Countries Problems

Like Edward Fagan Blog on Facebook:

Edward Fagan Blog On Facebook

by Edward Fagan

Abuse, Women And Self Image

Capital-punishment, A Supporter's View

Abuse, Women And Self ImageHello, can you spare a moment?

Abuse, the end must start somewhere 

Abuse against women should never happen; but many abused women think they deserve this treatment and make no effort to escape it. Such women need to change their self view; and start the process of practically untangling themselves from this life of destruction.

Sources that can help abused women improve their self view include the Holy Bible. These women can also use literature from the Living Church of God to help them; and the church also offers counseling to them. With an improved self view they can change their attitude; and they can develop self confidence and walk away from the relationship.

Please see the following post in this blog:

Love, The Dual Sided Object

Like Edward Fagan Blog on Facebook:

Edward Fagan Blog On Facebook

Please visit Living Church of God website:

http://www.lcg.org

By Edward Fagan

Country, And All For The Love Of It

Country, and a politician’s sentiments concerning his preference for acts of  betrayal against it and the people

Country of birth and upbringing of a politician should never be compromised by that politician. Politician ‘X’ recently wished that the e-mails of his rival, Politician ‘Y’, became hacked by the intelligence agency of a foreign nation. That foreign nation is a long time enemy of his country. His rival, Politician ‘Y’, is a former first lady and secretary of state of his nation.

Politician ‘X’ also hoped that the intelligence agency would make the hacked e-mails of Politician ‘Y’ public in his country.

Politician ‘X’ is a long standing supporter of this enemy nation. He seems committed to this nation rather than to his own nation.

This long time enemy of his nation has nuclear tipped ICBM’s aimed at every city in Politician ‘X’s’ country. Politician ‘X’ expressed his sentiments about Politician ‘Y’s’ e-mails in a recent news conference. Foreign news agencies covered that news conference.

He does not seem to understand the enormity of his expressed wish and hope. His expressed wish and hope bring into question his long standing claim that he is for love of nation etc., including fellow politicians. It also brings into question his claim that he’s going to serve his nation’s best interests if he’s elected president.

By Edward Fagan

They Need Help Sometimes Following Incarceration

They need help sometimes following release from penal institutions and except in certain cases, we should accommodate them.

They need help sometimes following their release from penal institutions. When our relatives and friends seek our help and support after their period of incarceration ends and they return to society, except in certain cases, this help should be given to them; and when it s given, it should be given selflessly.

The nature of the offence committed and the known disposition of the offender are important points to consider when deciding whether or not to offer help. These and other points will determine whether or not help is offered, the type of help that may be offered and the duration of any help that is offered. These and other points will also determine the terms of any help that may be offered.

Goetsch%20Winkler-exterior-RS.htm

Those who are offered help are going to be first time offenders only. They are going to be persons whose offence did not involve any kind of violence except in a case of self defense within the law.

They are also going to be persons who display an ability to control their temper and navigate situations involving minor tension and conflict between others and themselves. They are going to be persons with a known disposition toward normal behaviour. For example, the type just mentioned is going to be capable of performing in a job at the checkout point of a relative’s or friend’s retail business. (One’s self control is sometimes tested in this kind of situation.)

blond_haired_kid

 Those who are known to be honest and whose offence did not involve stealing money. Those whose offence did not involve sexual misconduct and whose past behaviour did not indicate a disposition toward that kind of misconduct.

The type of help offered can include food, clothing, shelter, employment, personal transportation, a spending allowance and money for start up business.

tower

The period of time during which this help is given will be determined by the needs of the recipient, the nature of the help offered and the terms under which the help is offered.

The help mentioned here is supposed to be of a temporary nature only and may be offered on a short or long term basis. It is intended to help recipients achieve a level of stability and basic self reliance and allow them to live normally without a permanent need for this help.

By Edward Fagan

 

 

Arrest Of An Innocent Man Near A Junction

This is an original creative composition written by Edward Fagan. (It is based on a personal experience.)

Arrest and the accusation

Arrest of Earl is not on his mind as he drives the truck to the junction and stops. Earl is driving on a road which runs adjacent to one which is busy with traffic. He patiently awaits the clearing of traffic on this road. Earl does not know an arrest awaits him following these few moments he spends at this junction.

His three passengers and fellow workers, two male and one female, and himself talk and laugh until the road clears.

The road finally clears and Earl exits from his stationary position while turning right onto the adjacent road. A female shouts something and flares her right hand in an angry manner. She does this from a vehicle traveling in the opposite direction. This female thinks he failed to stop at the junction. She, therefore, suggests this in her statement, and hand gestures intended at Earl.

Earl slows to a stop “I stopped at the junction Mam.”. She stops and disagrees “No, you drove straight through onto this road.”. Earl repeats his position a few times. He does this in response to her accusing him several times of not stopping at the junction.

She leaves her vehicle and walks to Earl’s and shows a police badge. “Switch off the engine and come out of the vehicle.”, she orders. Earl complies. “I’m Police Constable Lia Connell.”, she says, in a stern and somewhat angry tone. She’s young, perhaps in her mid to late twenties, and perfectly beautiful.

Arrest of an innocent man

“You failed to stop at the junction and that’s an offence.”, she says. She is violently poking her finger in Earl’s face and toward his eyes. Earl disagrees, “I stopped at the junction and exited after the road cleared.”. He then says “Do you see how dangerously close to my eyes your fellow officer is poking her finger?” “She’s not touching your eyes though.”, the other officer responds.

Constable Lia Connell opens a book and looks at Earl in an angry manner, “What’s your name?” “Earl Farley”, Earl answers calmly. She writes it in the book. “You failed to stop at the junction, why are you denying it?” Earl is surprised and upset at her behaviour. She demands to get a confession of guilt from him, and he wonders why. She even forgets, or otherwise refuses, to take his address.

“I stopped at the junction before driving onto this road.”, Earl insists. “OK fine! Arrest and handcuff him!”, she says angrily to one of her two male passengers.

A policeman handcuffs and places Earl in the unmarked police vehicle. Earl is surprised at his arrest; but he does not know what is yet to come. He sits in the rear between the two male passengers. It is 03: 00 p.m.

Arrest and the journey of brutality

The police speedily drive off Earl to the police station with the vehicle’s siren blaring and its beacon flashing. Earl sits with handcuffed hands in lap. There is silence in the vehicle. The phone in Earl’s top pocket rings. He attempts to answer it, so he takes it out and presses the answer button.  It is Earl’s boss and he hears the vehicle’s siren and suspects that Earl is under arrest.”Don’t let him answer that phone!”, Constable Connell angrily states. Earl does not expect what happens next.

Simultaneously, the outer hands of both male passengers grab Earl’s throat and start to choke him very tightly; while their inside hands tightly grab his handcuffed hands and start to take away the phone. He’s in intense pain and unable to speak. They also completely restrict all of his body movement by very forcefully pressing inward toward him. The police prevent him from speaking to his boss on the phone.

The two men who choked Earl take him to an interrogation room at the police station. The choking shocks and sickens Earl. “Why did you arrest and choke me?” he asks. “We can do you anything without having to answer any questions you ask us.”, answers John Bailey. He seems the more wicked and conceited of the two men.

Arrest and retention in a cell 

Sergeant Alvin Springfield gets Earl’s name from constable Lia Connell and calls Earl.”Earl Farley”, he calls, “I’m Sergeant Alvin Springfield. Can I take a statement from you or have you answer some questions?”. “I prefer not to give a statement or answer any questions. I thus wish to exercise my right to remain silent.”, Earl politely says. “Well, if that’s your position, I have to accept it.”, The Sergeant says. He slowly closes his notepad, gets up and leaves the room.

The police place Earl in a holding cell during the afternoon. They later charge him with failing to stop at the junction, and refusing to give his name and address. The police then give him a date for the first court-hearing of these charges, and release him on bail. They release Earl from the holding cell during late evening, 09: 30 p.m.

Arrest and court hearings

Earl visits a leading ear, nose and throat specialist on the day after his release.  The medical examination, expectantly, reveals throat and neck injury caused by the police choking him.

Hearing of the case continues for several months. Earl represents himself and is glad for the opportunity this gives him to question the police concerning the incident.

During one of the hearings, Earl questions Constable Lia Connell. “Constable Connell, did you enter the main road from the junction above the one from which I entered it?” “Yes I did.”, she replies. “Are you aware that there is an outward bend in the stretch of road which lies between the two junctions?” “I do not remember it.” she says. “Are you aware that this outward bend completely blocks the view of vehicles exiting both junctions from each other?” She hesitates, then slowly answers, “No, I’m not very familiar with the roads in this area.”

Arrest and court hearings continue

At this point Magistrate Robin Simpson makes a comment. “I may say something here,” he says, “I know this road very well, having grown up in the area. Motorists at one junction simply can not see vehicles at the other junction. It is therefore impossible for someone at one junction to know, by seeing, what someone at the other junction does.”

Earl continues his questioning, “Where was my vehicle when you first saw it?” “Your vehicle was on the main road.”, she answers. “Did you see my vehicle at or driving toward the junction, at any time?” “No, I did not.”, she replies. “I have no further questions to ask, your honour.”, Earl declares.

Earl calls his three passengers as witnesses during this same hearing. They confirm his claim that he gave his name when asked to give it. These three passengers also stated that Constable Lia Connell never asked for his address. They were consistent in their answers to questions from both Earl and the prosecution.

At this point during the hearing of the case, Magistrate Robin Simpson asks the prosecution a question. He asks them if they have any further questions for any member of the defence. “Your honour, the prosecution does not have any further questions for the defence.”, answers a member of the prosecution team. Magistrate Simpson adjourns the case for a week.

Arrest and establishment of truth

A week later, hearing of the case resumes. The prosecution give a brief summary of their position in the case and Earl does the same. Finally, Magistrate Robin Simpson states his position in the case., “Why is Mr. Farley accused of not stopping at the juncture? Why are the police accusing him of refusing to give his name and address? The police arrested and placed him in a cell at the station, why? He certainly did not commit any arrestable offences.”

He arranges some papers on his desk and pauses for a moment. “The police brought three charges against Mr. Farley that are not justified. Mr. Farley did not commit any of those three offences brought against him. The police should not have arrested him; his arrest was therefore unwarranted.” He turns his head in Earl’s direction and looks at Earl rather calmly. “You are therefore free to go Mr. Farley.”

By Edward Fagan