Advertisements
Mental Health

Mental Health, and politicians?

Mental health and politicians provide us with an interesting topic which we can discuss for ages. We have had this topic around for quite a while. Remember when a king of the ancient Babylonian super power became mentally ill. He remained in this state for seven years, Daniel 4: 31-34. This king ruled during the period 605-562 B.C.

Politicians in this state, besides, have always provided satirists and comedians with great working material. They have also provided audiences to comedy shows with good reasons to attend them.

Should our political leaders mental state matter to us, and do we need to monitor their mental state? Yes, their mental state should matter to us, and we need to monitor it. Given these two answers we should be able to detect quite early, signs of existing or oncoming illness.

In the event we detect such mental illness, there is a sensible solution that addresses this problem. We can thus use this solution to remove such a person from office smoothly and efficiently.

The sensible solution I refer to above is the 25th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It reflects the vision and foresight of the founding fathers of the U.S., even though it was ratified in 1967.

This is an awesome document and it has universal appeal and application. Other democratic countries can also adopt it to meet those needs and requirements that fall within its scope.

By Edward Fagan

Edward Fagan Blog

November 28, 2017

(This is a previously published original post that I accidentally deleted from the blog. I thought it necessary that I republished it into the blog.)

Advertisements
Mental Health

A silent teetotaller who politely refuses alcohol from persons who drink often experiences attempts by such persons to pressure him to drink. Drinkers tell him that he is still going to die, whether or not he drinks. It seems fitting that some drinkers would always make a reference to death in discussions involving drinking and non drinking.

It also seems fitting that some non drinkers, when given the opportunity to do so, would always make reference to the positive and optimistic prospects of living a sensible and practical life, and the advantages of health and wellness resulting from such a life to its practitioners.

These drinking enthusiasts, additionally, assume the right of choice between drinking and non drinking; but they are usually unwilling to grant that same right of choice to non drinking, health and wellness enthusiasts.

By Edward Fagan